Determinants of household participation in agricultural production in Shatale Region of the Bushbuckridge local Municipality, Mpumalanga Province

Abstract

The role of agriculture in poverty alleviation in the rural areas has been acknowledged and supported in South Africa. In former homelands, households generate livelihoods from agriculture and agricultural related activities. However, in some areas, the role of agriculture in alleviating poverty has not been appreciated but instead households participate in off-farm activities more frequently. Bushbuckridge area in the Mpumalanga province is such an area with few households engaging in agriculture. The study aims to investigate the determinants of household participation in agricultural production in Shatale region of Bushbuckridge Local Municipality (BLM). The study had three objectives; the first objective was determine socio-economic factors influencing household labour participation in agricultural production, the second was to analyse socio-economic factors influencing the amount of time allocated to agricultural production and the third objective was to analyse household income diversification in Shatale region of BLM. Multi-stage sampling and stratified sampling approaches were used to collect primary data from 86 households in ward 7 and ward 13 in Shatale region of Bushbuckridge Local Municipality (BLM). The double-hurdle model which comprises a probit model and a truncated regression model was used to analyse the data on assumption that the decision to participate in agricultural production and the amount of time allocated are influenced by different factors. Income diversity was analysed using the Number of Income Sources (NIS) method. The results of the first hurdle showed that gender of the household head, highest level of education, occupation of the household head, access to irrigation water, access to extension service and farming experience negatively influenced household participation in agricultural production and age of the household head and land size positively influenced household participation in agricultural production. The results of the second hurdle showed marital status of the household head, infants and irrigation water negatively influenced the amount of time allocated in agricultural production. Land size and farming experience positively influenced the amount of time allocated in agricultural production. About 49% of the households’ diversified income into four sources and 18.6 percent diversified into on five sources on incomes which included farming, old age pension, child support grant, trading and remittances. There is a need of government intervention in Shatale region to encourage household participation in agricultural production. Government can intervene through provision of land for farming, capacitating farming households, infrastructural development, increasing extension support services to farming households and expansion of canal networks.