dc.contributor.author |
Mehlape, M. M.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-11-22T08:59:54Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-11-22T08:59:54Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2018 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10386/2251 |
|
dc.description |
Journal article published in the International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives 04 - 06 July 2018, Stellenbosch University, Saldahna Bay, South Africa |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Politics-administration interface is perceived as the heart of practice of public administration and aims
at fostering relationships between administrators on one hand and political leaders and the public on another
hand. The interface is the direct opposite of the dichotomy and advocates for a complementary model to be
adopted where both politicians and administrators work hand in hand. Woodrow Wilson, widely acknowledged
as the founder of Public Administration as an academic discipline, famously asserted that proper administrative
questions were not political questions, meaning political questions are different from administrative questions.
In his view, politics was outside the purview of public administration. However, it can be argued that politics
cannot be separated from public administration because one needs the other. The findings indicate that politics
do play an important role in public administration of the country however; the problem starts when the
discipline of public administration tries to separate the two. The academic writings try to separate politics from
administration nevertheless; it may be possible in writing but difficult in practice. Hence the paper seeks to
probe the effects that politics has on public administration specifically in South African public administration.
The political leadership in the South African context contributes to the effectiveness of public administration
in the country. The paper seeks to analyse the benefits or rather seeks to look at how the political leadership
contributes or affect running of public administration. Furthermore, the relationship between politicians and
administrators at the local level is the point of view. A comprehensive literature survey or review in the study
was the most important research method to gather relevant data that supports the study. Thus, recommendations
are that, since politics cannot be separated from administration in practice, the relationship between
political leadership and public administration should be strengthened. |
en_US |
dc.format.extent |
7 pages |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives (IPADA) |
en_US |
dc.relation.requires |
pdf |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Dichotomy |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Politics |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Political leadership |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Public Administration |
en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Public administration |
en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Political leadership -- South Africa |
en_US |
dc.title |
The Effects of Political Leadership on Public Administration Within South African Local Government |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |