| dc.description.abstract |
Climate change plays a critical role in shaping both the geographic spread and
intensity of malaria outbreaks. Recent research demonstrates that climaterelated
factors surpass epidemiological, socio-economic, and environmental contributors
in driving malaria resurgence. Progress towards malaria elimination
has been further hindered by the COVID-19 pandemic, which disrupted control
programmes globally. In South Africa, despite implementation of the National
Malaria Elimination Strategic Plan (NMESP), malaria elimination targets remain
unmet, partly due to limitations in surveillance and predictive systems.
This thesis addresses the underutilisation of subjective Bayesian methods in
epidemiology, which incorporate expert knowledge into disease models. While
objective priors are commonly used due to their simplicity, subjective priors
informed by expert judgment offer richer, context-specific insights. However,
the process of prior elicitation is often hindered by complexity and resource
constraints. To overcome this, the thesis introduces a novel, efficient approach
that combines the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with statistical validation
techniques to incorporate expert knowledge into Bayesian models. The
approach provides a simple, time and resource efficient framework for eliciting
and applying subjective priors in Bayesian epidemiological models. This
thesis utelised both primary and secondary data. Primary data were collected
through a purposive sampling approach using a questionnaire to support expert
elicitation, with participants recruited nationally and internationally. Secondary
data included malaria case records (2018–2022) from the South African
ii
National Department of Health, climatological data from the South African
Weather Services, and environmental data from EarthExplorer platform, covering
the provinces of KwaZulu-Natal, Limpopo, and Mpumalanga.
The major contribution of this thesis is the development of a robust Bayesian
malaria prediction model that integrates both climate data and expert-informed
prior distributions. Comparative analysis indicates that subjective priors outperform
objective priors in enhancing model performance. These findings underscore
the value of expert knowledge in improving predictive accuracy and
guiding public health responses. The analysis reveals that malaria transmission
intensifies in regions with temperatures between 20–30°C, rainfall ranging
from 0–200 mm, and Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) values
of 0.5–0.8. Those conditions are associated with 200 to 1000 predicted
malaria cases. Ehlanzeni (Mpumalanga), uMkhanyakude (KwaZulu-Natal),
Vhembe, and Mopani (Limpopo) districts are identified as high-risk areas with
elevated malaria counts. Malaria incidence peaks in summer and autumn,
especially in regions experiencing temperatures of 12–20°C during the night,
moderate rainfall (100–200 mm), and NDVI levels exceeding 0.6. This implies
that malaria transmission intensify after cumulative rainfall creates optimal
mosquito breeding conditions. These findings support the development of early
warning systems and targeted vector control interventions. Future research
should explore the integration of Bayesian machine learning and further evaluate
the comparative performance of different priors across various epidemiological
contexts. |
en_US |