Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Nene, Lindokuhle Gary
dc.contributor.author Sokhulu, Lerato Hlengiwe
dc.date.accessioned 2026-03-30T20:51:44Z
dc.date.available 2026-03-30T20:51:44Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.identifier.issn Print: 2521-0262
dc.identifier.issn Online: 2662-012X
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10386/5427
dc.description Journal article published in African Perspectives of Research in Teaching and Learning Journal Issue 4, Volume 9, 2025 en_US
dc.description.abstract The rapid development of technological resources has propelled various sectors to adopt digitalised practices. Similarly, the integration of technological resources at the basic education level was rendered inevitable, particularly during the Coronavirus pandemic era and beyond. These technological developments affect curriculum implementation in schools and enhance teaching and learning practices. This qualitative case study explored teachers’ integration of technological resources into the curriculum in the Fourth Industrial Revolution era in South African primary schools. The interpretive paradigm was used to provide insights into teachers’ integration of technological resources. Three teachers were purposively and conveniently sampled to participate in the study. Data were generated using online one on-one semi-structured interviews and Zoom Focus Group Discussions. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) served as an analytical tool to frame the study. Findings indicate that teachers primarily rely on personal knowledge (personal integration) and social influences (informal integration) when integrating technological resources, rather than on the Department of Basic Education's formal policy guidelines (formal integration). While informal integration is influenced by teachers' technological knowledge and skills gained through social networks, personal integration of technological resources is shaped by each teacher's individual opinions and available opportunities. Conversely, formal integration conforms to institutional policies and structured curriculum requirements. This study recommends that teachers give formal integration of these resources utmost priority because of the ongoing structural limitations, including inadequate professional development, limited infrastructure, and the demands of a curriculum that is content-heavy en_US
dc.format.extent 12 pages en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher African Perspectives of Research in Teaching and Learning Journal (APORTAL) en_US
dc.relation.requires PDF en_US
dc.subject Integration en_US
dc.subject Technological resources en_US
dc.subject Curriculum en_US
dc.subject Teachers en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Integration (Theory of knowledge) en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Curriculum change en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Curriculum planning en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Education -- Curricula en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Electronic data processing en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Teaching -- South Africa en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Basic education -- South Afica en_US
dc.title Digitalising the curriculum : teachers’ integration of technological resources into the CAPS framework en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ULSpace


Browse

My Account