Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gachago, Daniela
dc.contributor.author Govender, Shanali
dc.contributor.author Mayisela, Tabisa
dc.contributor.author Huang, Cheng-Wen
dc.contributor.author Hamman, Nadine
dc.contributor.author Cox, Glenda
dc.date.accessioned 2026-03-31T11:46:58Z
dc.date.available 2026-03-31T11:46:58Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.identifier.issn 2521-0262 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn 2662-012X (Online)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10386/5430
dc.description Journal article published in African Perspectives of Research in Teaching and Learning Journal Issue 6, Volume 9 en_US
dc.description.abstract This article explores the implementation of radical flexibility and social justice principles in the Blended and Online Learning Design (BOLD) programme at the University of Cape Town. Drawing on Fraser's concept of participatory parity and Veletsianos and Houlden's concept of radical flexibility, we explore how programme and course design can challenge traditional educational structures to create more equitable learning opportunities. The BOLD programme reimagines access to and success in postgraduate education by designing in response to Fraser's economic, cultural, and political dimensions. The programme responds to the maldistribution of resources by creating opportunities for flexible financial commitments and centring the use of open educational resources. BOLD responds to misrecognition by foregrounding diverse representations of identity through “course buddies” and personalised learning pathways that allow for flexible pacing. Thirdly, the programme responds to matters of misrepresentation by leveraging policy changes, creating varied entry points, and intentionally designing opportunities for students to shape the programme. Implementing these changes required navigating institutional constraints and exploring the capacity of systems to change. While the programme team remains committed to radical flexibility, this article demonstrates the potential of an interim and principled pragmatic flexibility that centres student agency while working to enhance flexibility in existing systems. This design case study contributes to ongoing discussion about the purpose of higher education, questioning not just how to deliver education equitably, but what kind of educational future we want, and for whom. en_US
dc.format.extent 16 Pages en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher African Perspectives of Research in Teaching and Learning Journal (APORTAL) en_US
dc.relation.requires PDF en_US
dc.subject Online learning design en_US
dc.subject Blended learning design en_US
dc.subject Radical flexibility en_US
dc.subject Social justice en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Online learning en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Education en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Instructional systems -- Design en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Computer-assisted instruction en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Education higher, South Africa en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Graduate students -- South Africa en_US
dc.title A bold proposition: a participatory parity approach to radical flexibility in designing a postgraduate diploma en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ULSpace


Browse

My Account