Breast cancer classification according to immunohistochemical markers : clinicopathologic features in women treated at Pietersburg hospital, Limpopo

Abstract

Background Breast cancer is known to be a heterogeneous disease that demands patient centered care. Establishing the clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer patients is a vital step in an effort to individualize their treatment. Aim The aim is to evaluate the clinicopathologic features of the different subtypes of breast cancer when classified according to immunohistochemistry markers in women attending Pietersburg hospital. Methods A retrospective review of medical records of women treated at Pietersburg hospital between 2010 and 2011 was done. Data collection was extracted on a customized data collection sheet. Chi square was used to determine association between clinicopathologic features and molecular subtypes. Analysis of variants was used to assess association between molecular types and age. Results The mean age of the population was 55.3 years (+/-14 standard deviation). The majority of patients were in stage III (46.9%) and IV (33.5%). The ER, PR, HER2/neu positive rate was 50.6%, 30% and 14,3 % respectively with a negative rate of 13,4%, 19,5% and 23,4% respectively. ER, PR and HER2/neu was unknown in 18%, 19, 5% and 23,4% respectively. The most common molecular subtype was luminal A (53,6%) followed by triple negative (27.2%), HER2/neu (11, 4%) and luminal B (7. 9%).There was no association between the subtypes and tumour stage (p=0.578).The rate of distant metastasis was similar across the subtypes being 37,9%,35%, 32,4% and 31,9% in HER2/neu, luminal B ,luminal A and TNBC, respectively. All four molecular subtypes had high rate of axillary lymph node involvement (p=0.886) Luminal A had the least percentage of high grade tumours with TNBC having the highest. Five-year overall survival for the cohort was 25, 6% with luminal A and B having a better 5 year overall survival of 27,2% and 25% respectively, whereas HER2/neu and TNBC had lower 5 year OS of 24% and 23,3%. Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that luminal A subtype is the most predominant and the majority might benefit from hormonal therapy. However, some patients could not be classified due to missing IHC marker test results. The outcome across all four subtypes is poor and more effort should be put towards improving the diagnosis and treatment individualization and follow-up in these patients.