Yield responses of swiss chard under in-field water harvesting techniques in Limpopo Province

dc.contributor.advisorVanassche, F. M. G.
dc.contributor.advisorAyodele, V. I.
dc.contributor.advisorManyevere, A.
dc.contributor.authorMaluleka, Tiyiselani Welcome
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-06T08:30:18Z
dc.date.available2019-03-06T08:30:18Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.descriptionThesis (MSc. (Horticulture)) -- University of Limpopo, 2018en_US
dc.description.abstractRainwater harvesting is an old age practice used in water-scarce rainfed crop production areas. It is practiced to supplement additional water for crops with insufficient amounts of rainfall for optimum production. The aim of this study was to assess yield responses of Swiss chard under In-field rainwater harvesting techniques (IRWH) and catchment areas. The trials were conducted at two sites, University of Limpopo experimental farm (Syferkuil) and on farmer’s field at Apel. The main plots were two catchment areas (2 m (1 m runoff strip plus 1 m basin)) and (3 m (2 m runoff strip plus 1 m basin)), while the subplots were five IRWH techniques namely; Control (farmers practice), Rainfed, IRHW (without mulch + irrigation), IRWH+Mulch and IRWH+Mulch+Irrigation. The results obtained showed no significant differences in yield of Swiss chard in relation to catchment areas of 3 and 2 m respectively. However, significant differences in plant height, plant vigour, number of leaves and chlorophyll contents were obtained under different IRWH techniques. Significantly, highest average plant height of 40.75 cm was obtained in IRWH+Mulch compared to Rainfed with the lowest average 28.50 cm at Syferkuil. A similar trend was obtained at Apel. There were significant differences in number of leaves under IRWH techniques; the highest mean of 16.00 was obtained in the control (farmers practice) treatment, while the lowest mean of 9.00 was obtained in IRWH treatment at Apel. At Syferkuil, significantly highest average number of leaves was obtained in the IRWH+Mulch+irrigation treatment, while the lowest average number of leaves was obtained in the rainfed treatment. Regarding the yield of Swiss chard, the significantly highest average yield was obtained under IRWH+Mulch+irrigation and 3 m catchment treatment combination which was 84.86 t ha-1 compared to 20.66 t ha-1 in rainfed and 3 m catchment treatment combination at Syferkuil. Similar trend was found at Apel with the highest average yield recorded in IRWH+Mulch+irrigation treatment combination. Hence, IRWH technique with mulch and irrigation could be adopted by growers in a water-scarce environment like the Limpopo Province of South Africa.en_US
dc.format.extentxii, 74 leavesen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10386/2321
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.requiresAdobe Acrobat Readeren_US
dc.subjectCatchment areasen_US
dc.subjectMulchen_US
dc.subjectIrrigationen_US
dc.subjectIRWH techniquesen_US
dc.subject.lcshRainwateren_US
dc.subject.lcshWater harvestingen_US
dc.subject.lcshSwiss charden_US
dc.titleYield responses of swiss chard under in-field water harvesting techniques in Limpopo Provinceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
maluleka_tw_2018 .pdf
Size:
1.62 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
thesis

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: