Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Molele, S. B.
dc.contributor.author Makgoba, Ouma Priscilla
dc.contributor.other Mongale, I. P.
dc.date.accessioned 2026-01-19T12:56:18Z
dc.date.available 2026-01-19T12:56:18Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10386/5234
dc.description Thesis (M. Com. ( Economics)) -- University of Limpopo, 2025 en_US
dc.description.abstract This study investigated comparatively the implications of electricity shocks and governance indicators on economic growth in South Africa and China for 1995 to 2021 period. The two economies have been facing a slow growth rate for over a decade now, and that is a major concern considering the importance of growth in any country. The key variables investigated were electricity supply, corruption, political instability and economic growth. Subsequently, inflation, debt and money supply were added as control variables in the study to strengthen the models. The study used Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) to test for the relationship among variables, and Granger causality to test for causality. The preceding techniques used were impulse response function and variance of decomposition to forecast economic growth in relation to the shock in electricity supply. The ARDL long-run results revealed a negative relationship between economic growth and all the key macroeconomic variables in South Africa and China. The results further showed that all the key variables have a dire effect on the economic growth of South Africa, whereas they have little impact on the economic growth of China. The short-run results revealed contradictory results across the two countries. The Granger causality test results found evidence of causality only in political instability and economic growth in South Africa and no causality in China. The impulse response function results exhibited that economic growth responds negatively to shocks from electricity supply in South Africa, whereas it responds positively in China. Due to that, the study consequently recommended that South Africa follow some of China’s policies to solve its electricity issues. The study further recommended that the policymakers of both countries focus more on policies that promote accountability and transparency. That will reduce corruption and political instability levels in both economies and ultimately improve economic growth. The study added that the policymakers of South Africa should implement policies to address these challenges urgently as their effects are more pronounced in the country. en_US
dc.format.extent xiii, 141 leaves en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.requires PDF en_US
dc.subject Economic growth en_US
dc.subject Electricity supply en_US
dc.subject Corruption en_US
dc.subject Political instability en_US
dc.subject ARDL en_US
dc.subject Causality en_US
dc.subject Impulse response function en_US
dc.subject Variance of decomposition en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Economic development en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Sustainable development en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Electricity en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Political corruption en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Electric power consumption en_US
dc.title The implication of electricity shocks and selected governance indicators on growth prospects : a comparative analysis between South Africa and China en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ULSpace


Browse

My Account