Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Themane, M. J.
dc.contributor.author Mampuru, Motubatse William
dc.date.accessioned 2014-08-28T09:51:07Z
dc.date.available 2014-08-28T09:51:07Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10386/1117
dc.description Thesis (M.A.) --University of Limpopo, 2012 en_US
dc.description.abstract The study was undertaken because the researcher was concerned about the denial of poor learners the right to education, as their parents could not afford to pay School Fees due to high unemployment and poverty in rural schools. The researcher noticed that schools sent learners home to collect school fees and also withheld learner reports until the required amount was paid. As a result, “Fee Exemption policy” was available to exempt poor parents from paying School Fees, but it was not effective because schools did not inform them to apply for this policy. As a result, poor learners decide to dropout. The government introduced “no-fee-schools” policy to end marginalisation of poor learners. Further, it appeared that School Allocations are little because rural schools have a shortage of school facilities and some of the facilities are too expensive.A purposive sampling strategy was used to select 3 public secondary schools as research sites and 26 respondents as a sample of the target population. Respondents consisted of 8 members; the principal, SGB member and 6 educators from School A; Nine (9) respondents; the principal, 2 SGB members and 6 educators from School B; the principal, 2 SGB members and 6 educators from School C. Twenty-six respondents were considered to be sufficient because my focus was not on representation. The respondents were considered to be key informants with required data. Interviews and document analysis were used as data collection methods. The researcher used semi-structured interviews because they are interactive, and they also give the respondents a voice associated with their perspectives and experiences. Document analysis was used to supplement data collected through interviews. The interviewees discovered that learners were denied the right to education, despite the departmental policies formulated to help poor learners and theirparents. Furthermore, “no-fee-schools” policy was formulated to enable poor students to access education, but it is problematic because School Allocation is not deposited to school accounts on time and does not cover all the school costs. The study recommends that poor learners should not be denied the right to education and that the departmental policy (viz., Fee Exemption Policy) should be monitored to ensure that marginalised learners benefit from this scheme. This policy should also be budgeted for so as to enable poor schools to purchase modern facilities to improve the quality of teaching and learning and employ extra educators so as to reduce the educator-learner ratios and so on. en_US
dc.format.extent ix, 90 leaves en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Limpopo (Turfloop Campus) en_US
dc.relation.requires PDF en_US
dc.subject No-fee school policy en_US
dc.subject Free education en_US
dc.subject.ddc 373.12 en_US
dc.subject.lcsh High Schools - South Africa en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Policy making en_US
dc.title Challenges faced by secondary schools in the implementation of "No fee Schools Policy" in the Sekhukhune District of Limpopo Province en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ULSpace


Browse

My Account